top of page

Resources

The links on this page are provided for informational and research purposes. Inclusion does not constitute endorsement by the Richardsville Coalition, and the views expressed by external organizations or authors do not necessarily reflect those of the Coalition.

Call to Action

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN LOCAL COMMUNITIES LOSE THE RIGHT TO SAY NO?

The proposed Yeat Substation in Richardsville, Virginia, is a warning to rural communities everywhere. Dominion Energy representatives have stated publicly that site-specific studies have not been completed and would follow approval of the proposed substation. Meanwhile, our local fire department has already raised serious concerns about the site’s safety, including limited emergency access and the lack of adequate alternative egress.

In addition, our community relies on private wells, volunteer fire protection and rural roads. Residents face concerns about emergency evacuation, access for firefighting equipment, wildfire risk, potential groundwater contamination and impacts on surrounding homes, farms, forests and wildlife habitats.

​

OUR ENVIRONMENT AND HISTORIC LANDSCAPES ARE ALSO AT RISK.

On May 19, 2026, Preservation Virginia named the Joshua Falls–Yeat transmission corridor to its list of Virginia’s Most Endangered Historic Places for 2026. The designation followed a nomination by the Piedmont Environmental Council, American Battlefield Trust and eight additional conservation and historic-preservation organizations. Eleven historic districts and several battlefields could be affected by the proposed project. The approximately 115-mile corridor would cut through largely undeveloped agricultural and forested landscapes, requiring an approximately 200-foot-wide cleared right-of-way.

This is not simply a question of where to place electrical equipment. It is about the permanent industrialization and fragmentation of rural landscapes, the destruction of established habitat, potential impacts on streams and groundwater, and the degradation of historic places that cannot be recreated once lost. Our farmland, forests, waterways, wildlife habitats and historic landscapes are irreplaceable resources, not vacant land waiting to be industrialized.

These concerns deserve thorough, independent evaluation BEFORE a site or corridor is approved, not after the decision has effectively been made!

​

THIS IS WHY LOCAL SITING AUTHORITY MATTERS.

State and federal regulators may evaluate regional electrical reliability and infrastructure needs but who understands whether the roads can accommodate emergency vehicles? Who knows whether residents can safely evacuate? Who understands the capabilities of our volunteer fire department, the limitations of our water supply, sensitive natural resources and the historical significance of the surrounding landscape? The people who live here. The first responders who serve here. The local officials responsible for protecting us.

Public safety and environmental suitability must be demonstrated BEFORE siting approval, not promised afterward.

 

Now, state and federal policymakers are advancing measures intended to accelerate energy infrastructure approvals and potentially expand government siting authority. If legislation allows utilities to bypass local approval, communities could lose one of their most important safeguards against dangerous, environmentally destructive or incompatible industrial development.

​

WE DEMAND THAT OUR STATE AND FEDERAL LEADERS:

1. Protect local siting authority for substations, including those associated with interstate transmission projects. Oppose any legislation that weakens or eliminates meaningful local approval requirements.

2. Require independent site-specific safety and environmental studies BEFORE approval, including emergency access, evacuation routes, firefighting capabilities, private wells, groundwater, wetlands, wildlife habitats, historic resources and alternative locations.

3. Give local emergency responders and environmental experts a meaningful voice in the siting process. Their documented concerns must be addressed before decisions are made.

4. Respect local comprehensive plans, agricultural zoning and conservation priorities. Utility convenience and data center demand must not override established land-use protections.

5. Require use of existing industrial sites, brownfields and infrastructure corridors before allowing new greenfield development in residential and agricultural communities.

6. Protect Virginia’s irreplaceable historic and natural resources. Require thorough consideration of cumulative environmental, cultural and scenic impacts before authorizing massive new transmission corridors or substations.

CONTACT YOUR STATE AND FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVES TODAY.

Tell them:

NO to legislation that strips local communities of substation siting authority.

NO to approving industrial-scale electrical infrastructure before its location has been demonstrated to be safe and environmentally appropriate.

NO to sacrificing farmland, forests, historic landscapes and rural communities to accommodate unchecked data center demand.

OUR SAFETY IS NOT NEGOTIABLE. OUR PROPERTY RIGHTS MATTER. OUR ENVIRONMENT IS NOT EXPENDABLE. AND OUR COMMUNITIES ARE NOT SACRIFICE ZONES.

FAQ

PROTECT CULPEPER

Block Valley Link & The Proposed Yeat Substation

What Every Culpeper Resident Should Know

 

WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED?

 

Valley Link is proposing a new 115-mile, 765-kilovolt transmission line connecting Campbell County to a new 88 Acre Yeat substation in Richardville, Culpeper County. The project would be one of the largest transmission projects ever built in Virginia.  

The proposed line would use steel transmission structures approximately 135–160 feet tall and require a new greenfield corridor cleared approximately 200 feet wide across private and rural lands.  The project is being developed by Valley Link, a partnership involving Dominion Energy, FirstEnergy Transmission, and Transource Energy.  

 

WHO BENEFITS FROM THIS PROJECT?

 

The proposed Yeat Substation is not being built to provide electricity to Culpeper homes or to solve a local power shortage. According to project materials, the Valley Link project is intended to address regional transmission needs identified through the PJM planning process.

Residents believe the project is being driven primarily by growing electricity demand in Northern Virginia and are asking why Culpeper’s farms, forests, homes, and communities should bear the burden of infrastructure intended to serve regional growth. Residents are also concerned that the Yeat Substation could position Culpeper for future transmission expansion and additional industrial-scale electrical infrastructure.

 

WHY ARE CULPEPER RESIDENTS CONCERNED?

 

PROPERTY RIGHTS

Transmission corridors often require permanent utility easements across private property. Virginia law also allows utilities to pursue eminent domain under certain circumstances.  

 

FARMS, FORESTS & RURAL CHARACTER

Residents are concerned about the permanent loss of agricultural land, forest fragmentation, scenic views, wildlife habitat, and the rural character that makes Culpeper a desirable place to live.  

 

FUTURE INFRASTRUCTURE

Residents believe the Yeat substation will become a major transmission hub that enables additional electrical infrastructure in the future. The full long-term buildout has not been disclosed and Dominion is purchasing over 400 acres at this site which may be used for additional infrastructure to meet future demand. This remains a significant concern within the community.

 

QUALITY OF LIFE

Residents have raised concerns about visual impacts, property values, environmental effects, well water contamination, noise, and the long-term transformation of rural communities into utility corridors.  

 

WHAT HAS CULPEPER COUNTY SAID?

​

On April 7, 2026, the Culpeper County Board of Supervisors voted 6–1 to formally oppose the proposed Valley Link transmission line and Yeat substation.

 

WHO MAKES THE FINAL DECISION?

​

The Valley Link project is not approved by Culpeper County.  The final decision will be made by the Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) after reviewing the application, public comments, and testimony from affected communities.  While the transmission lines are determined by the SCC, Culpeper County can block the conditional use permits of the Yeat site.

​

GET THE FACTS

​

For maps, project updates, research, public meeting information, and resources for affected residents:

Block Valley Link & Save Rural Virginia

 

OUR MESSAGE

​

Reliable electricity matters. Property rights matter. Protecting Culpeper’s farms, forests, communities, and quality of life matters.

 

WHAT’S AT STAKE?

​

• Private property rights

• Farms and agricultural land

• Forests and wildlife habitat

• Well water resources

• Public safety and emergency response

• Rural character and quality of life

• The future direction of growth in Culpeper County

The question is simple:

Should Culpeper sacrifice its land, communities, and way of life for infrastructure that is not being built to meet Culpeper’s needs?

 

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

​

Contact your state and local representatives and tell them YEAT and Valley Link do not belong in Culpeper or our rural landscape!

 

Tell your Board of Supervisors to remain strong in opposition to the Yeat Substation and Valley Link project.

Protect Culpeper. Protect Property Rights. Protect Rural Virginia.

​

Spread community awareness to combat the Valley Link disinformation and pressure campaign from front groups like Power for Tomorrow occurring through TV ads, mailers and internet advertisements that claim this project is to "Keep the Lights on" for "Virginia families, homes and hospitals".

Lawn Tractor Scene
att.crMhJ61vWxgEpkrszueKQhjCzAqx_fX8kZWVPZo9x9A.JPG

Related Coalitions

bottom of page